Category Archives: Main Stream Media/Journalism

Zimmerman Trial … a Pound of Flesh

A pound of flesh war_rscc_71_624x544Opinion by AAABTonto:

Currently our country’s citizenry is focused on a spectacle of rage, stupidity and judicial malpractice—the George Zimmerman trial. Regardless of your opinion of George Zimmerman or Trayvon Martin, the only person left in the world that knows what really happened is George Zimmerman. Liars are usually seen to be liars because they, at some point, altar their story—Zimmerman has not.

What has happened is that the media, the White House and the DOJ have all gotten involved in this case and done their best to turn this incident into a political, racial cogwheel.

Newly Released Documents Detail the Department of Justice’s Role in Organizing Trayvon Martin Protests

They, and their cohorts in media, have turned this tragic incident into a clown car circus act. A police chief has been fired because he found no reason to file charges. The media has gone out of its way to illustrate this as a racial incident by twisting hearsay, NBC’s altering the tape recorded 911 call Zimmerman made, and the splitting of legal hairs.

The senseless armchair quarterbacking of this is insane and it has players from all corners of the political spectrum. Michael Savage has “savaged” Zimmerman, claiming that he had “wanted to be a policeman” that he “was looking for, praying for someone to shoot.” How could Michael Savage possibly know what was in Zimmerman’s mind that terrible night? He cannot; Savage is projecting. Savage says the issue is that Zimmerman was armed and Martin was not–that is NOT the issue.

Michael Savage in his own words:


Michael Savage Blasts George Zimmerman – Aired July 1, 2013

I have a key question for Michael Savage and the rest of the Zimmerman lynchers out there who have already convicted this man without the consideration of facts. If Zimmerman wanted to shoot someone then why did he only fire one shot? I might have emptied the clip if it were me and my head was being bashed into the concrete. I think the fact that Zimmerman had the discipline to fire a single shot demonstrates that he did not intend to kill his assailant, only stop the attack.

MSNBC’s Hayes: FNC and Conservatives Treating Black Americans Like Zimmerman Treated Trayvon Martin

MSNBC host Chris Hayes interviewed University of Connecticut Professor Jelani Cobb, the MSNBC host complained that conservatives are treating black Americans the way Zimmerman treated Trayvon Martin. Hayes said:

“So here’s what frustrates, angers me genuinely about this, is, what conservatives are doing to black people at large is precisely what George Zimmerman did to Trayvon Martin.”

Really? Give me an example of said treatment. “Genuinely” my posterior! How is it that conservatives are mistreating blacks? This is a preposterous claim and … I think it it demonstrates black racism of whites. It perpetuates a societal ill that we have nearly outgrown, but the race baiters can’t let go of their number one shake-down technique.

Then there is the circus act in the courtroom itself. Mark Levin explains:


Mark Levin BLASTS ‘Obnoxious And Pathetic’ Judge Debra Nelson: ‘You’re Way Out Of Line!’

George Zimmerman should have never been tried. This was a clear instance of self defense. One does not have to endure a beating in order to use his firearm—one only needs to demonstrate that he was in fear of his life. Having your head caved in would fit that descriptor. Trayvon had several chances to end his assault and he chose not to. That decision cost him his life and … it has cost George Zimmerman his life; because he will be a target for as long as he lives. This will never go away from him regardless of the outcome of this trial.

Ex-Sanford Police Chief Was Pressured To Arrest Zimmerman — Fired For Refusing To Arrest Without Probable Cause

This trial is a story of bad decisions. Bad decisions by the two men involved, bad decisions by the White House and the DOJ for stoking the flames of racial tension, bad decisions by Sanford city leaders and it will probably spawn bad decisions by low-information lynch-mobs, who will riot in demand of their pound of flesh regardless of the rule of law or factual evidence. I find it ironic that these same people who are willing to riot while shouting “no justice, no peace” also believe that the Constitution was written by “old white bigots” who couldn’t possibly have foreseen our modern circumstance. This is a step backwards, a devolution and return to mid-evil mob rule.

It is a “fundamental transformation” for sure ….

A midevil stake burning

Western Denial Sets a Dangerous Precedent


TOMMY ROBINSON EDL ON NEAR FM JULY 2ND 2013

Opinion by AAABTonto:

As you listen to the above interview you will hear the interviewer repeatedly try interject his own preconceptions of Islam as fact, when it is quite clear to me that this person is utterly ignorant of Islam. He claims that there is no evidence” that the Qur’an promotes violence, when the it clearly does. Late in the interview he is critical of Tommy Robinson for inviting Pamella Geller to the UK to speak because she is “hostile” to Islam. How is it that a critical analysis of Islam is “aggressive” or “derogatory” towards Muslims?

It is not …

Sahih al-Bukhari 6922 Allah’s Messenger said, “If anyone changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.”

Qur’an 5:51O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people.

Qur’an 9:29Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the Religion of Truth, from among the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Qur’an 4:24Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those (captives and slaves) whom your right hands possess.

… But there is no evidence that the Qur’an promotes violence. Of course there isn’t—if you didn’t read the Qur’an to begin with!

This “politically correct” lens that those in the main stream media (MSM) and on the progressive left of the spectrum force everyone to view the world through is the very reason that we can’t convince those same people of reality. It is true that there are a few sects of Islam that renounce violence and have a “live and let live” philosophy, but they are the exception and they are criticized and persecuted by the other more orthodox Muslims. So what is Islam?


What Is Islam?

Is there any likelihood that those of us who know the difference between critical analysis and slander will ever convince the MSM to realize their folly and change their ways? I don’t think so … they will simply have to replaced and they are—by people like me and you who value truth and the miracle of life.

Warning the following is very graphic:

“Put yourself in my shoes”: BBC runs puff piece lauding Syrian jihadi cannibal

“Face-to-face with Abu Sakkar, Syria’s ‘heart-eating cannibal,'” by Paul Wood for BBC News, July 5–why do these journalists have to twist themselves into pretzels in order to find a way to legitimize this kind of savagery? What is the need to “understand” the motive of a group of people who have sworn violence, demonstrated violence and pledged to subjugate everyone in the world to Islam?

Islam will dominate the world 2

Examine the following video. We are provided with a textbook example of Muhammad’s teachings. Egyptian Muslims take notice a Christian girl and begin to yell “Nasara!” (Christians). They then proceed to tear the girl’s clothes off, while shouting “Allahu Akbar!” The cameraman is then pushed out of the way and we don’t see what happened to the unfortunate girl:


غتصاب مسيحيات في وضح النهار وسط صيحات التكبير

Day after day for decades now we have watched as the terrorists have waged a holy war against the West and blamed us for its results. Simultaneously, the progressive elements of western society have proclaimed that poverty and inequality are reasons for their hostility towards us and it is we who must reach out to Islam and demonstrate our good faith. Well, we’ve done that in the form of billions of dollars in foreign aid that is then used to fund more terrorist activities. That, in my opinion, proves that the progressive’s perverse presumption is 100% incorrect—devout Muslims are going to attack us (the nonbelievers) because their doctrine commands them to do so. It is that damn simple!

Sudan: Islamic leader calls for decisive action against converts from Islam to Christianity

Brothers MuslimAs previously stated, I have no animus toward Muslims; but, if they are unwilling to accept others whose beliefs differ from their own and they find it just to commit violence upon them simply for that reason, then what respect do we owe them? How is possible to reason or find compromise with them? We cannot expect them to cease their persecution of us simply because we find a way to make neurotic excuses for their abhorrent behavior.

John Stuart Mill“The only freedom which deserves the name, is that of pursuing our own good in our own way, so long as we do not attempt to deprive others of theirs, or impede their efforts to obtain it.”
– John Stuart Mill