Category Archives: Liberty

Eric Holder: ‘People who feel threatened have a duty to retreat’


Eric Holder: ‘People who feel threatened have a duty to retreat’

Opinion by AAABTonto:

This man is unfit to be an attorney, much less the Attorney General. He is a menace.  It is my understanding that Florida’s “stand your ground law” has benefited black citizens in self defense court cases greatly, so let’s take away a “common sense” law that helps people and replace it with a pacifist law that allows victims of violence to be further violated and humiliated. Way to go there, Herr Holder … you idiot.

Eric Holder: Self-defense is deadly; ‘People who feel threatened have a duty to retreat’

And the President didn’t want to be left out of the spotlight of stupidity, so he put his two cents in … (probably our two cents—aw, never mind!)

Obama: If you oppose the Gang of Eight immigration bill you’re probably scared of minorities

obama-and-holder_________________________________________________________________________

UPDATE:

Blacks benefit from Florida ‘Stand Your Ground’ law at disproportionate rate

Two Visions of America

Are there two Americas?


Al Sharpton Reaction To Zimmerman Verdict ‘Slap in the Face to Those Who Believe in Justice’

*     *     *

Rafael Cruz at Free the People

Opinion by AAABTonto:

The George Zimmerman trial has pealed back another layer of Obama’s nefarious scheme to imperialize the Presidency. I am tired of the race baiting hatred of malcontents like Al Sharpton, but I am used to his predictable variety of horse dung. What I am not accustomed to is that same kind of re-fried belligerence coming from the Leader of the free world and what is supposed to be the pinnacle of law enforcement, the Department of Justice. In all my 50 years on this blue ball I never thought I would see the arrogance and promptitude I see being displayed by Barack Obama and Eric Holder. It is infuriating, frightening and nauseating to watch them cherry-pick the law in order to further their political agendas.

people-dont-know-their-true-power

The White House and the DOJ are supposed to lead the people and unite them, not divide them, but every day it becomes evermore clear Obama’s “fundamental transformation” of America is a diabolical plot to replace liberty with tyranny—to impose socialized control and to stifle freedom and individuality.

Sinister Obama 1

mad as hellWe don’t have to take this from the One (who waited for himself). We don’t have to put up with the ruling-class Republicans attempting to lead us around by the nose and telling us that this is just the way things are now. I don’t care about the NSA anymore. I don’t care what list I might be on. I don’t care what the progressive Left says about me or what the MSM might report about me. I am fed up with this crap. I am fed up with them using my money to tell ME what a lousy Bible-clinging, gun-toting, bigot, sexist, Islamophobic, homophobic, Neanderthal I am!

Obama’s vision of America is NOT American and I have the RIGHT to disagree with him or any of his booger-eating, moron, malcontent minions that slobber at his fascist feet and call us names.

I am an American, dammit and Americans don’t put up with stuff like this!

American flag 2

12 Year Old Egyptian Boy Will Give You Faith in Humanity

Bless this brilliant boy’s heart and if any harm should come to him I will take it upon myself to seek vengeance in whatever form possible … this child’s sensibility is what the world needs and it needs it fast!

Egypt : The Next President

*    *    *

Egyptian Child Drops a Knowledge Bomb in This Must See Video

From the YouTube description:

This 12 years old boy is just stunningly, incredibly smart. Listen to him as he excoriates the Muslim Brotherhood, relentlessly dissecting their power grab for Egypt.

The original interview was realized by the Egyptian newspaper El Wady, in Cairo, on Oct 19, 2012. Free Arabs (www.freearabs.com) is responsible of the editing, translation and subtitles.

Zimmerman Trial … a Pound of Flesh

A pound of flesh war_rscc_71_624x544Opinion by AAABTonto:

Currently our country’s citizenry is focused on a spectacle of rage, stupidity and judicial malpractice—the George Zimmerman trial. Regardless of your opinion of George Zimmerman or Trayvon Martin, the only person left in the world that knows what really happened is George Zimmerman. Liars are usually seen to be liars because they, at some point, altar their story—Zimmerman has not.

What has happened is that the media, the White House and the DOJ have all gotten involved in this case and done their best to turn this incident into a political, racial cogwheel.

Newly Released Documents Detail the Department of Justice’s Role in Organizing Trayvon Martin Protests

They, and their cohorts in media, have turned this tragic incident into a clown car circus act. A police chief has been fired because he found no reason to file charges. The media has gone out of its way to illustrate this as a racial incident by twisting hearsay, NBC’s altering the tape recorded 911 call Zimmerman made, and the splitting of legal hairs.

The senseless armchair quarterbacking of this is insane and it has players from all corners of the political spectrum. Michael Savage has “savaged” Zimmerman, claiming that he had “wanted to be a policeman” that he “was looking for, praying for someone to shoot.” How could Michael Savage possibly know what was in Zimmerman’s mind that terrible night? He cannot; Savage is projecting. Savage says the issue is that Zimmerman was armed and Martin was not–that is NOT the issue.

Michael Savage in his own words:


Michael Savage Blasts George Zimmerman – Aired July 1, 2013

I have a key question for Michael Savage and the rest of the Zimmerman lynchers out there who have already convicted this man without the consideration of facts. If Zimmerman wanted to shoot someone then why did he only fire one shot? I might have emptied the clip if it were me and my head was being bashed into the concrete. I think the fact that Zimmerman had the discipline to fire a single shot demonstrates that he did not intend to kill his assailant, only stop the attack.

MSNBC’s Hayes: FNC and Conservatives Treating Black Americans Like Zimmerman Treated Trayvon Martin

MSNBC host Chris Hayes interviewed University of Connecticut Professor Jelani Cobb, the MSNBC host complained that conservatives are treating black Americans the way Zimmerman treated Trayvon Martin. Hayes said:

“So here’s what frustrates, angers me genuinely about this, is, what conservatives are doing to black people at large is precisely what George Zimmerman did to Trayvon Martin.”

Really? Give me an example of said treatment. “Genuinely” my posterior! How is it that conservatives are mistreating blacks? This is a preposterous claim and … I think it it demonstrates black racism of whites. It perpetuates a societal ill that we have nearly outgrown, but the race baiters can’t let go of their number one shake-down technique.

Then there is the circus act in the courtroom itself. Mark Levin explains:


Mark Levin BLASTS ‘Obnoxious And Pathetic’ Judge Debra Nelson: ‘You’re Way Out Of Line!’

George Zimmerman should have never been tried. This was a clear instance of self defense. One does not have to endure a beating in order to use his firearm—one only needs to demonstrate that he was in fear of his life. Having your head caved in would fit that descriptor. Trayvon had several chances to end his assault and he chose not to. That decision cost him his life and … it has cost George Zimmerman his life; because he will be a target for as long as he lives. This will never go away from him regardless of the outcome of this trial.

Ex-Sanford Police Chief Was Pressured To Arrest Zimmerman — Fired For Refusing To Arrest Without Probable Cause

This trial is a story of bad decisions. Bad decisions by the two men involved, bad decisions by the White House and the DOJ for stoking the flames of racial tension, bad decisions by Sanford city leaders and it will probably spawn bad decisions by low-information lynch-mobs, who will riot in demand of their pound of flesh regardless of the rule of law or factual evidence. I find it ironic that these same people who are willing to riot while shouting “no justice, no peace” also believe that the Constitution was written by “old white bigots” who couldn’t possibly have foreseen our modern circumstance. This is a step backwards, a devolution and return to mid-evil mob rule.

It is a “fundamental transformation” for sure ….

A midevil stake burning

A Conversation with a Leftist Activist

A conversation with a Leftist activist

cropped-Christianity-Islam-Judaism.pngAAABTonto: This is an article by Robert Spencer that he posted at Jihad Watch, I thought you all might enjoy …

Recently a man named Richard Potter, who describes himself as a “social worker and activist” and is a contributor to Your Middle East, began writing me rude messages on Twitter. We ended up having a long exchange about debating, and ultimately he sent me a long email explaining why he thought my work was “belittling” to Muslims.

Since I think Potter’s beliefs and assumptions about my work are commonly held, at least among Leftists and Islamic supremacists, and since views such as his are obviously mainstream given the British banning and other cancellations of my talks, I thought I’d present Potter’s letter here with my answers interspersed, by way of explaining why I do what I do. Note that this is not a back-and-forth, but my responses to his many particular points in one long email. (Potter’s spelling and grammar are unaltered from his original email.)

Potter: Your attacks on Islam are belittling and hurtful to Muslims in the same ways that attacks on the bible, Catholicism, and Christianity are belittling to their believers.

Spencer: So you think that Christopher Hitchens’ attacks on Christianity are just as bad as my writings? Do you think there is any place for criticism of a religion, or do you think that religions should be off-limits to criticism? I am a Christian myself and don’t think that attacks on the Bible or the faith are in the least belittling as such — in fact, I welcome them. If one’s faith can’t withstand critics and criticism, then I am not sure it is worth holding.

Potter: I could very easily point out the correlation between violence against Homosexuals in America and Christianity, especially because it is supported by scripture.

Spencer: Could you really? Could you point me to a case where someone attacked a homosexual and quoted scripture to justify it? I can give you 1000 cases (and more) where Muslims killed someone and quoted Qur’an to justify it. Is it wrong to point out that they do that? Is it belittling? And if you come back and say, “No, but you tar all Muslims with responsibility and guilt for such instances,” I would ask you to provide even one example where I’ve actually done that.

Potter: I could point out that the Catholic Churches belief in the limit to err within it’s own hierarchy and scriptural supported belief to handle matters internally has led to an epidemic of pedophilia and child abuse,

Spencer: You could make a case for that. Are you saying that it would be inherently wrong or belittling to do so? Or are you saying that because a case can be made against the Catholic Church, one should not make any case against Islam?

Potter: I could point out that the scriptural support that it is good and justifiable to own slaves lent itself all too easily to centuries of it in the United States, and it still continues in parts of the Global South today with similar justifications.

Continue reading …

Western Denial Sets a Dangerous Precedent


TOMMY ROBINSON EDL ON NEAR FM JULY 2ND 2013

Opinion by AAABTonto:

As you listen to the above interview you will hear the interviewer repeatedly try interject his own preconceptions of Islam as fact, when it is quite clear to me that this person is utterly ignorant of Islam. He claims that there is no evidence” that the Qur’an promotes violence, when the it clearly does. Late in the interview he is critical of Tommy Robinson for inviting Pamella Geller to the UK to speak because she is “hostile” to Islam. How is it that a critical analysis of Islam is “aggressive” or “derogatory” towards Muslims?

It is not …

Sahih al-Bukhari 6922 Allah’s Messenger said, “If anyone changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.”

Qur’an 5:51O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people.

Qur’an 9:29Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the Religion of Truth, from among the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Qur’an 4:24Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those (captives and slaves) whom your right hands possess.

… But there is no evidence that the Qur’an promotes violence. Of course there isn’t—if you didn’t read the Qur’an to begin with!

This “politically correct” lens that those in the main stream media (MSM) and on the progressive left of the spectrum force everyone to view the world through is the very reason that we can’t convince those same people of reality. It is true that there are a few sects of Islam that renounce violence and have a “live and let live” philosophy, but they are the exception and they are criticized and persecuted by the other more orthodox Muslims. So what is Islam?


What Is Islam?

Is there any likelihood that those of us who know the difference between critical analysis and slander will ever convince the MSM to realize their folly and change their ways? I don’t think so … they will simply have to replaced and they are—by people like me and you who value truth and the miracle of life.

Warning the following is very graphic:

“Put yourself in my shoes”: BBC runs puff piece lauding Syrian jihadi cannibal

“Face-to-face with Abu Sakkar, Syria’s ‘heart-eating cannibal,'” by Paul Wood for BBC News, July 5–why do these journalists have to twist themselves into pretzels in order to find a way to legitimize this kind of savagery? What is the need to “understand” the motive of a group of people who have sworn violence, demonstrated violence and pledged to subjugate everyone in the world to Islam?

Islam will dominate the world 2

Examine the following video. We are provided with a textbook example of Muhammad’s teachings. Egyptian Muslims take notice a Christian girl and begin to yell “Nasara!” (Christians). They then proceed to tear the girl’s clothes off, while shouting “Allahu Akbar!” The cameraman is then pushed out of the way and we don’t see what happened to the unfortunate girl:


غتصاب مسيحيات في وضح النهار وسط صيحات التكبير

Day after day for decades now we have watched as the terrorists have waged a holy war against the West and blamed us for its results. Simultaneously, the progressive elements of western society have proclaimed that poverty and inequality are reasons for their hostility towards us and it is we who must reach out to Islam and demonstrate our good faith. Well, we’ve done that in the form of billions of dollars in foreign aid that is then used to fund more terrorist activities. That, in my opinion, proves that the progressive’s perverse presumption is 100% incorrect—devout Muslims are going to attack us (the nonbelievers) because their doctrine commands them to do so. It is that damn simple!

Sudan: Islamic leader calls for decisive action against converts from Islam to Christianity

Brothers MuslimAs previously stated, I have no animus toward Muslims; but, if they are unwilling to accept others whose beliefs differ from their own and they find it just to commit violence upon them simply for that reason, then what respect do we owe them? How is possible to reason or find compromise with them? We cannot expect them to cease their persecution of us simply because we find a way to make neurotic excuses for their abhorrent behavior.

John Stuart Mill“The only freedom which deserves the name, is that of pursuing our own good in our own way, so long as we do not attempt to deprive others of theirs, or impede their efforts to obtain it.”
– John Stuart Mill

Ich Bin Ein Kuffar

obama maniacalIch Bin Ein Kuffar

Opinion by AAABTonto:

Millions of Egyptians took to the streets this week in the largest political demonstration in the history of mankind to demand that President Morsi step down. Our media virtually ignored it.

Morsi declined. The Egyptian military gave him 48 hours to effect a political turnaround or resign and he refused. They arrested him. Mohammed Morsi, the democratically-elected president is, or was, the Muslim Brotherhood’s political point man in the Middle East and was fully endorsed by the Obama administration. Obama has said he is “deeply concerned” by the Egyptian military’s political intervention and released a statement calling for a return to civilian rule:

“We are deeply concerned by the decision of the Egyptian Armed Forces to remove President Morsi and suspend the Egyptian constitution,” Obama said. “I now call on the Egyptian military to move quickly and responsibly to return full authority back to a democratically-elected civilian government as soon as possible.”

Although the US did not call for Mr Morsi’s return to power, the administration urged the military against “any arbitrary arrests” of the ousted president or his Muslim Brotherhood supporters. However, Mr. Morsi was reportedly being held at a military facility while Egyptian troops rounded up hundreds of MB senior Islamists.

Hamas-linked CAIR, other Muslim Brotherhood groups and spokesmen in U.S. crestfallen over Morsi’s ouster

This is an amazing turn of events as it is well known that the Obama administration is supportive of the MB and had instigated the ouster of Morsi’s predecessor, Hosni Mubarak. This was the center piece of Obama’s beloved “Arab Spring” of which Obama proudly boasted, claiming it was a “new democracy for the Middle East.” The only problem was that Egyptians didn’t share Obama’s opinion of Mohammed Morsi.

Egypt’s Dangerous Turmoil Is Ultimately Obama’s Doing

This event proves Obama’s illegitimacy in foreign policy and it is shirt he cannot remove. Russia and China have thumbed their nose at Obama in recent weeks. Assad has danced all over Obama’s “red line” daring him to take action in a hell-hole, where the US has no business doing anything–despite the maniacal aspirations of John McCain and Lyndsey Graham. Obama is a paper tiger.

Egypt protests Morsi and Obama

Morsi has pitted Egyptians against one another after declaring emergency power and forcing through a theocratic constitution while intimidating opponents this past November and December. The Muslim Brotherhood condemned the U.N.’s declaration on women’s rights in March, and said it would “lead to the complete disintegration of society.” 

Since the MB political takeover in Egypt, violence has reigned supreme and their fragile economy has taken a nose dive. Tourism is down to a trickle. Coptic Christians have been persecuted, murdered and their churches burned in large numbers, while Obama has stood by and said nothing.

New Egyptian authorities shut down three Islamic supremacist TV channels and raid Al Jazeera’s offices

The Egyptian people don’t give a damn about Obama’s arrogant visions of an “Arab Spring” or the Muslim Brotherhood’s political aspirations. They want their country back from nearly a century of broken promises. They want jobs, food and their way of life returned–they want their pride restored. Obama thinks that because he was raised as Muslim that he is respected by Muslims and from what I have seen and learned that isn’t how it works. Obama is kuffar …


Thousands of Salafis in Tunisia: Obama, We Are All Osama

Obama does not even respect the people who voted for him. Everyone is beneath him because he is the smartest person in every room he enters. He despises our Constitution and the Founding Fathers who authored it, but he might take a lesson from them if he would bother himself to do so:

Thomas jefferson 1“We are the friends of liberty everywhere, custodians only of our own.”
– Thomas Jefferson